III. COMPOSITE SYSTEMS, PREPARATIONS, AND MEASUREMENTS
A. States of composite systems
1. Schmidt decomposition
[Schmidt 07 a, b],
[von Neumann 32] (Sec. VI. 2),
[Furry 36 a, b],
[Jauch 68] (Sec. 11. 8),
[Ballentine 90 a] (Sec. 8. 3),
[Albrecht 92] (Secs. II, III and Appendix),
[Barnett-Phoenix 92],
[Albrecht 93] (Sec. II and Appendix),
[Peres 93 a] (Chap. 5),
[Elby-Bub 94] (uniqueness of triorthogonal decomposition of pure states),
[Albrecht 94] (Appendix),
[Mann-Sanders-Munro 95],
[Ekert-Knight 95],
[Peres 95 c] (Schmidt decomposition of higher order),
[Aravind 96],
[Linden-Popescu 97]
(invariances in Schmidt decomposition under local transformations),
[Acín-Andrianov-Costa-(+3) 00]
(Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit pure states),
[Terhal-Horodecki 00] (Schmidt number for density matrices),
[Higuchi-Sudbery 00],
[Carteret-Higuchi-Sudbery 00]
(multipartite generalisation of the Schmidt decomposition),
[Pati 00 c] (existence of the Schmidt decomposition for tripartite
system under certain condition).
2. Entanglement measures
[Barnett-Phoenix 91] ("index of correlation"),
[Shimony 95],
[Bennett-DiVincenzo-Smolin-Wootters 96] (for a mixed state),
[Popescu-Rohrlich 97 a],
[Schulman-Mozyrsky 97],
[Vedral-Plenio-Rippin-Knight 97],
[Vedral-Plenio-Jacobs-Knight 97],
[Vedral-Plenio 98 a],
[DiVincenzo-Fuchs-Mabuchi-(+3) 98],
[Belavkin-Ohya 98],
[Eisert-Plenio 99] (a comparison of entanglement measures),
[Vidal 99 a] (a measure of entanglement is defended which quantifies the
probability of success in an optimal local conversion from a single copy of a pure
state into another pure state),
[Parker-Bose-Plenio 00] (entanglement quantification and purification
in continuous-variable systems),
[Virmani-Plenio 00] (various entanglement measures do not give
the same ordering for all quantum states),
[Horodecki-Horodecki-Horodecki 00 a]
(limits for entanglement measures),
[Henderson-Vedral 00] (relative entropy of entanglement and irreversibility),
[Benatti-Narnhofer 00] (on the additivity of entanglement formation),
[Rudolph 00 b],
[Nielsen 00 c] (one widely used method for defining measures of entanglement violates
that dimensionless quantities do not depend on the system of units being used),
[Brylinski 00] (algebraic measures of entanglement),
[Wong-Christensen 00],
[Vollbrecht-Werner 00]
(entanglement measures under symmetry),
[Hwang-Ahn-Hwang-Lee 00] (two mixed states such that their ordering
depends on the choice of entanglement measure
cannot be transformed, with unit efficiency,
to each other by any local operations),
[Audenaert-Verstraete-De Bie-De Moor 00],
[Bennett-Popescu-Rohrlich-(+2) 01]
(exact and asymptotic measures of multipartite pure state
entanglement),
[Majewski 01],
[Życzkowski-Bengtsson 01]
(relativity of pure states entanglement),
[Abouraddy-Saleh-Sergienko-Teich 01]
(any pure state of two qubits may be decomposed
into a superposition of a maximally entangled state and an orthogonal
factorizable one. Although there are many such decompositions, the weights of
the two superposed states are unique),
[Vedral-Kashefi 01] (uniqueness of entanglement measure and thermodynamics),
[Vidal-Werner 02] (a computable measure of entanglement),
[Eisert-Audenaert-Plenio 02].
3. Separability criteria
[Peres 96 d, 97 a, 98 a] (positive partial transposition (PPT) criterion),
[Horodecki-Horodecki-Horodecki 96 c],
[Horodecki 97],
[Busch-Lahti 97],
[Sanpera-Tarrach-Vidal 97, 98],
[Lewenstein-Sanpera 98] (algorithm to obtain the best separable
approximation to the density matrix of a composite system.
This method gives rise to a condition of separability and to a measure
of entanglement),
[Cerf-Adami-Gingrich 97],
[Aravind 97],
[Majewski 97],
[Dür-Cirac-Tarrach 99]
(separability and distillability of multiparticle systems),
[Caves-Milburn 99] (separability of various states for N qutrits),
[Duan-Giedke-Cirac-Zoller 00 a]
(inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems),
[Simon 00 b] (Peres-Horodecki separability criterion for
continuous variable systems),
[Dür-Cirac 00 a] (classification of multiqubit mixed states:
Separability and distillability properties),
[Wu-Chen-Zhang 00] (a necessary and sufficient criterion for
multipartite separable states),
[Wang 00 b],
[Karnas-Lewenstein 00]
(optimal separable approximations),
[Terhal 01] (review of the criteria for separability),
[Chen-Liang-Li-Huang 01 a]
(necessary and sufficient condition of separability of any system),
[Eggeling-Vollbrecht-Wolf 01]
([Chen-Liang-Li-Huang 01 a] is a reformulation of the
problem rather than a practical criterion;
reply: [Chen-Liang-Li-Huang 01 b]),
[Pittenger-Rubin 01],
[Horodecki-Horodecki-Horodecki 01 b]
(separability of n-particle mixed states),
[Giedke-Kraus-Lewenstein-Cirac 01]
(separability criterion for all bipartite Gaussian states),
[Kummer 01] (separability for two qubits),
[Albeverio-Fei-Goswami 01]
(separability of rank two quantum states),
[Wu-Anandan 01] (three necessary separability criteria for
bipartite mixed states),
[Rudolph 02],
[Doherty-Parrilo-Spedalieri 02],
[Fei-Gao-Wang-(+2) 02],
[Chen-Wu 02] (generalized partial transposition
criterion for separability of multipartite quantum states).
4. Multiparticle entanglement
[Elby-Bub 94] (uniqueness of triorthogonal decomposition of pure states),
[Linden-Popescu 97],
[Clifton-Feldman-Redhead-Wilce 97],
[Linden-Popescu 98 a],
[Thapliyal 99] (tripartite pure-state entanglement),
[Carteret-Linden-Popescu-Sudbery 99],
[Fivel 99],
[Sackett-Kielpinski-King-(+8) 00]
(experimental four-particle entanglement),
[Carteret-Sudbery 00] (three-qubit pure states are classified by
means of their stabilizers in the group of local unitary transformations),
[Acín-Andrianov-Costa-(+3) 00]
(Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-qubit pure states),
[Acín-Andrianov-Jané-Tarrach 00]
(three-qubit pure-state canonical forms),
[van Loock-Braunstein 00 b]
(multipartite entanglement for continuous variables),
[Wu-Zhang 01] (multipartite pure-state entanglement and the
generalized GHZ states),
[Brun-Cohen 01]
(parametrization and distillability of three-qubit entanglement).
5. Entanglement swapping
[Yurke-Stoler 92 a] (entanglement from independent particle sources),
[Bennett-Brassard-Crépeau-(+3) 93] (teleportation),
[Żukowski-Zeilinger-Horne-Ekert 93] (event-ready-detectors),
[Bose-Vedral-Knight 98] (multiparticle generalization of ES),
[Pan-Bouwmeester-Weinfurter-Zeilinger 98] (experimental ES:
Entangling photons that have never interacted),
[Bose-Vedral-Knight 99] (purification via ES),
[Peres 99 b] (delayed choice for ES),
[Kok-Braunstein 99] (with the current state of technology,
event-ready detections cannot be performed with the experiment of
[Pan-Bouwmeester-Weinfurter-Zeilinger 98]),
[Polkinghorne-Ralph 99] (continuous variable ES),
[Żukowski-Kaszlikowski 00 a] (ES with parametric down
conversion sources),
[Hardy-Song 00] (ES chains for general pure states),
[Shi-Jiang-Guo 00 c]
(optimal entanglement purification via ES),
[Bouda-Buzzek 01] (ES between multi-qudit systems),
[Fan 01 a, b],
[Son-Kim-Lee-Ahn 01]
(entanglement transfer from continuous variables to qubits),
[Karimipour-Bagherinezhad-Bahraminasab 02 a]
(ES of generalized cat states).
6. Entanglement distillation (concentration and purification)
(Entanglement concentration: How to create, using only LOCC, maximally entangled
pure states from not maximally entangled ones.
Entanglement purification: How to distill pure maximally entangled states out of mixed entangled states.
Entanglement distillation means both concentration or purification)
[Bennett-Bernstein-Popescu-Schumacher 95]
(concentrating partial entanglement by local operations),
[Bennett 95 b],
[Bennett-Brassard-Popescu-(+3) 96],
[Deutsch-Ekert-Jozsa-(+3) 96],
[Murao-Plenio-Popescu-(+2) 98]
(multiparticle EP protocols),
[Rains 97, 98 a, b],
[Horodecki-Horodecki 97] (positive maps
and limits for a class of protocols of entanglement distillation),
[Kent 98 a] (entangled mixed states and local purification),
[Horodecki-Horodecki-Horodecki 98 b, c, 99 a],
[Vedral-Plenio 98 a] (entanglement measures and EP procedures),
[Cirac-Ekert-Macchiavello 99] (optimal purification of single qubits),
[Dür-Briegel-Cirac-Zoller 99] (quantum repeaters based on EP),
[Giedke-Briegel-Cirac-Zoller 99] (lower bounds for attainable fidelity in EP),
[Opatrný-Kurizki 99] (optimization approach to entanglement distillation),
[Bose-Vedral-Knight 99] (purification via entanglement swapping),
[Dür-Cirac-Tarrach 99]
(separability and distillability of multiparticle systems),
[Parker-Bose-Plenio 00] (entanglement quantification and EP
in continuous-variable systems),
[Dür-Cirac 00 a] (classification of multiqubit mixed states:
Separability and distillability properties),
[Brun-Caves-Schack 00] (EP of unknown quantum states),
[Acín-Jané-Dür-Vidal 00]
(optimal distillation of a GHZ state),
[Cen-Wang 00] (distilling a GHZ state from
an arbitrary pure state of three qubits),
[Lo-Popescu 01]
(concentrating entanglement by local actions-beyond mean values),
[Kwiat-Barraza López-Stefanov-Gisin 01]
(experimental entanglement distillation),
[Shor-Smolin-Terhal 01]
(evidence for nonadditivity of bipartite distillable entanglement),
[Pan-Gasparoni-Ursin-(+2) 03]
(experimental entanglement purification of arbitrary unknown states, Nature).
7. Disentanglement
[Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber 87] (D of wave functions),
[Chu 98] (is it possible to disentangle an entangled
state?),
[Peres 98 b] (D and computation),
[Mor 99] (D while preserving all local properties),
[Bandyopadhyay-Kar-Roy 99]
(D of pure bipartite quantum states by local cloning),
[Mor-Terno 99] (sufficient conditions for a D),
[Hardy 99 b] (D and teleportation),
[Ghosh-Bandyopadhyay-Roy-(+2) 00]
(optimal universal D for two-qubit states),
[Buzek-Hillery 00] (disentanglers),
[Zhou-Guo 00 a] (D and inseparability correlation
in a two-qubit system).
8. Bound entanglement
[Horodecki 97],
[Horodecki-Horodecki-Horodecki 98 b, 99 a] (a BE state is an entangled
mixed state from which no pure entanglement can be distilled),
[Bennett-DiVincenzo-Mor-(+3) 99]
(unextendible incomplete product bases provide a systematic way of
constructing BE states),
[Linden-Popescu 99] (BE and teleportation),
[Bruß-Peres 00] (construction of quantum states with BE),
[Shor-Smolin-Thapliyal 00],
[Horodecki-Lewenstein 00] (is BE for continuous variables a rare
phenomenon?),
[Smolin 01] (four-party unlockable BE state,
rS=1/4 åi=14 |fiñáfi| Ä|fiñáfi|,
where fi are the Bell states),
[Murao-Vedral 01]
(remote information concentration -the reverse process to quantum telecloning-
using Smolin's BE state),
[Gruska-Imai 01] (survey, p. 57),
[Werner-Wolf 01 a] (BE Gaussian states),
[Sanpera-Bruß-Lewenstein 01] (Schmidt number witnesses
and BE),
[Kaszlikowski-Żukowski-Gnaci\'nski 02] (BE admits a local realistic description).
9. Entanglement as a catalyst
[Jonathan-Plenio 99 b]
(using only LOCC one cannot transform |f1ñ into |f2ñ, but with the assistance of an
appropriate entangled state |yñ one can transform |f1ñ into |f2ñ
using LOCC in such a way that the state |yñ can be returned back after the process:
|yñ serves as a catalyst for otherwise impossible transformation),
[Barnum 99] (quantum secure identification using entanglement and
catalysis),
[Jensen-Schack 00]
(quantum authentication and key distribution using catalysis),
[Zhou-Guo 00 c] (basic limitations for entanglement catalysis),
[Daftuar-Klimesh 01 a] (mathematical structure of entanglement catalysis),
[Anspach 01] (two-qubit catalysis in a four-state pure bipartite
system).
B. State determination, state discrimination,
and measurement of arbitrary observables
1. State determination, quantum tomography
[von Neumann 31],
[Gale-Guth-Trammell 68] (determination of the quantum state),
[Park-Margenau 68],
[Band-Park 70, 71, 79],
[Park-Band 71, 80, 92],
[Brody-Meister 96] (strategies for measuring identically prepared particles),
[Hradil 97] (quantum state estimation),
[Raymer 97] (quantum tomography, review),
[Freyberger-Bardroff-Leichtle-(+2) 97] (quantum tomography, review),
[Chefles-Barnett 97 c]
(entanglement and unambiguous discrimination between non-orthogonal states),
[Hradil-Summhammer-Rauch 98] (quantum tomography as normalization of
incompatible observations).
2. Generalized measurements, positive operator-valued measurements (POVMs),
discrimination between non-orthogonal states
[Neumark 43, 54] (representation of a POVM by a
projection-valued measure -a von Neumman measure-
in an extended higher dimensional Hilbert space; see also [Nagy 90]),
[Berberian 66] (mathematical theory of POVMs),
[Jauch-Piron 67] (POVMs are used in a generalized analysis of the localizability of quantum systems),
[Holevo 72, 73 c, 82],
[Benioff 72 a, b, c],
[Ludwig 76] (POVMs),
[Davies-Lewis 70] (analysis of quantum observables in terms of POVMs),
[Davies 76, 78],
[Helstrom 76],
[Ivanovic 81, 83, 93],
[Ivanovic 87] (how discriminate unambiguously
between a pair of non-orthogonal pure states -the procedure has less than unit
probability of giving an answer at all-),
[Dieks 88],
[Peres 88 b] (IDP: Ivanovic-Dieks-Peres measurements),
[Peres 90 a] (Neumark's theorem),
[Peres-Wootters 91] (optimal detection of quantum information),
[Busch-Lahti-Mittelstaedt 91],
[Bennett 92 a] (B92 quantum key distribution scheme: Using two nonorthogonal states),
[Peres 93 a] (Secs. 9. 5 and 9. 6),
[Busch-Grabowski-Lahti 95],
[Ekert-Huttner-Palma-Peres 94] (application of IDP to eavesdropping),
[Massar-Popescu 95] (optimal measurement procedure for an infinite
number of identically prepared two-level systems: Construction of an infinite POVM),
[Jaeger-Shimony 95] (extension of the IDP analysis to two states
with a priori unequal probabilities),
[Huttner-Muller-Gautier-(+2) 96] (experimental unambiguous
discrimination of nonorthogonal states),
[Fuchs-Peres 96],
[Lütkenhaus 96] (POVMs and eavesdropping),
[Brandt-Myers 96, 99] (optical POVM receiver for quantum cryptography),
[Grossman 96] (optical POVM; see appendix A of [Brandt 99 b]),
[Myers-Brandt 97] (optical implementations of POVMs),
[Brandt-Myers-Lomonaco 97] (POVMs and eavesdropping),
[Fuchs 97] (nonorthogonal quantum states maximize classical information capacity),
[Biham-Boyer-Brassard-(+2) 98] (POVMs and eavesdropping),
[Derka-Buzek-Ekert 98] (explicit construction of
an optimal finite POVM for two-level systems),
[Latorre-Pascual-Tarrach 98] (optimal, finite, minimal POVMs for the
cases of two to seven copies of a two-level system),
[Barnett-Chefles 98] (application of the IDP to construct a
Hardy type argument for maximally entangled states),
[Chefles 98] (unambiguous discrimination between multiple quantum states),
[Brandt 99 b] (review),
[Nielsen-Chuang 00],
[Chefles 00 b]
(overview of the main approaches to quantum state discrimination),
[Sun-Hillery-Bergou 01]
(optimum unambiguous discrimination between linearly independent
nonorthogonal quantum states),
[Sun-Bergou-Hillery 01]
(optimum unambiguous discrimination
between subsets of non-orthogonal states),
[Peres-Terno 02].
3. State preparation and measurement of arbitrary observables
[Fano 57],
[Fano-Racah 59],
[Wichmann 63] (density matrices arising from incomplete measurements),
[Newton-Young 68] (measurability of the spin density matrix),
[Swift-Wright 80] (generalized Stern-Gerlach experiments for the
measurement of arbitrary spin operators),
[Vaidman 88] (measurability of nonlocal states),
[Ballentine 90 a] (Secs. 8. 1-2, state preparation and determination),
[Phoenix-Barnett 93],
[Popescu-Vaidman 94] (causality constraints on nonlocal measurements),
[Reck-Zeilinger-Bernstein-Bertani 94 a, b] (optical realization of
any discrete unitary operator),
[Cirac-Zoller 94] (theoretical preparation of two
particle maximally entangled states and GHZ states with atoms),
[Żukowski-Zeilinger-Horne 97] (realization of any photon observable,
also for composite systems),
[Weinacht-Ahn-Bucksbaum 99] (real experiment to control
the shape of an atomic electron's wavefunction),
[Hladký-Drobný-Buzek 00] (synthesis of arbitrary unitary operators),
[Klose-Smith-Jessen 01] (measuring the state of a large angular momentum).
4. Stern-Gerlach experiment and its successors
[Gerlach-Stern 21, 22 a, b], (SGI: Stern-Gerlach interferometer; a SG followed
by an inverted SG:)
[Bohm 51] (Sec. 22. 11),
[Wigner 63] (p. 10),
[Feynman-Leighton-Sands 65] (Chap. 5);
[Swift-Wright 80] (generalized SG experiments
for the measurement of arbitrary spin operators),
(coherence loss in a SGI:)
[Englert-Schwinger-Scully 88],
[Schwinger-Scully-Englert 88],
[Scully-Englert-Schwinger 89];
[Summhammer-Badurek-Rauch-Kischko 82]
(experimental "SGI" with polarized neutrons),
[Townsend 92] (SG, Chap. 1, SGI, Chap. 2),
[Platt 92] (modern analysis of a SG),
[Martens-de Muynck 93, 94] (how to measure the spin of the electron),
[Batelaan-Gay-Schwendiman 97] (SG for electrons),
[Venugopalan 97]
(decoherence and Schrödinger's-cat states in a SG experiment),
[Patil 98] (SG according to QM),
[Hannout-Hoyt-Kryowonos-Widom 98] (SG and quantum measurement theory),
[Shirokov 98] (spin state determination using a SG),
[Garraway-Stenholm 99] (observing the spin of a free electron),
[Amiet-Weigert 99 a, b]
(reconstructing the density matrix of a spin s through SG measurements),
[Reinisch 99]
(the two output beams of a SG for spin 1/2 particles should not show interference
when appropriately superposed because an entanglement between
energy level and path selection occurs),
[Schonhammer 00] (SG measurements with arbitrary spin),
[Gallup-Batelaan-Gay 01] (analysis of the propagation of electrons through an
inhomogeneous magnetic field with axial symmetry:
A complete spin polarization of the beam is demonstrated,
in contrast with the semiclassical situation, where the spin splitting is blurred),
[Berman-Doolen-Hammel-Tsifrinovich 02]
(static SG effect in magnetic force microscopy),
[Batelaan 02].
5. Bell operator measurements
[Michler-Mattle-Weinfurter-Zeilinger 96]
(different interference effects produce three different results,
identifying two out of the four Bell states with the other two states giving the same
third measurement signal),
[Lütkenhaus-Calsamiglia-Suominen 99] (a never-failing measurement of the
Bell operator of a two two-level bosonic system is impossible with beam splitters, phase
shifters, delay lines, electronically switched linear elements, photo-detectors, and
auxiliary bosons),
[Vaidman-Yoran 99],
[Kwiat-Weinfurter 98]
("embedded" Bell state analysis:
The four polarization-entangled Bell states can be discriminated if, simultaneously, there
is an additional entanglement in another degree of freedom -time-energy or momentum-),
[Scully-Englert-Bednar 99]
(two-photon scheme for detecting the four polarization-entangled Bell states
using atomic coherence),
[Paris-Plenio-Bose-(+2) 00] (nonlinear interferometric setup
to unambiguously
discriminate the four polarization-entangled EPR-Bell photon pairs),
[DelRe-Crosignani-Di Porto 00],
[Vitali-Fortunato-Tombesi 00] (with a Kerr nonlinearity),
[Andersson-Barnett 00]
(Bell-state analyzer with channeled atomic particles),
[Tomita 00, 01] (solid state proposal),
[Calsamiglia-Lütkenhaus 01]
(maximum efficiency of a linear-optical Bell-state analyzer),
[Kim-Kulik-Shih 01 a]
(teleportation experiment of an unknown arbitrary polarization state
in which nonlinear interactions are used for the Bell state measurements
and in which all four Bell states can be
distinguished),
[Kim-Kulik-Shih 01 b]
(teleportation experiment with a complete Bell state measurement
using nonlinear interactions).